Diazepam For Sale India The Universe, a large gap

Medellin, 24th September 2008

THE UNIVERSE, LARGE POPULATION, BUT ALMOST VACUUM.

Our solar system is Almost empty. Sun has a diameter of 1'400 .000 km. Earth has a diameter of 12,000 km and Its distance to Sun is 149'600 .000 km. It is to say, distance Sun - Earth is 106 times larger Than Sun's diameter.

It Means That, if we repre Sun with a 30 cm ball, Should we stay at Earth 30x106 cm = 3.180cm = 31.80 m. To Obtain a scaled representation, the Earth & amp; rsquo, s Should Be sized diameter 30/116 cm = 0.25 cm.

giant planet Jupiter is of Our solar system. By Its diameter is 140,000 km and Its distance to Sun is 778'600 .000. Distance Sun - Jupiter is 556 times larger Than Sun's diameter, so, if we repre Sun by a 30 cm ball, to Have A scaled draw, We Need to stay at Jupiter 30x556cm = 16.680cm = 166.80 m, and how Jupiter & rsquo ; s diameter is 1 / 10 of Sun's diameter, ITS representation Would be 3 cm diameter ball.

Let's see what's Happens with Pluto, the dwarf planet and one of The Most distant object of the solar system. Pluto's diameter is by 1 / 1000 of Sun's one and the Pluto - Sun distance is 000 km 5870'000.

4192 Sun's diameter fits the times Pluto - Sun distance. If we Maintain the Same proportion as above, it is to say Sun's representation is 30cm ball, Then, Pluto Should Be collocate 30x4192cm = 125,760 cm = 1257.6 m, and the scaled Would Be 0.3 cm diameter.

If we leave from Our system, The nearest star is Proxima, in the Milky Way. Sun - Proxima's distance is 3.98 x10 13 km. Proxima's Sun's diameter is 0.15. Diameter of Sun fits Mentioned 28'000 .000 times the distance. The Sun is scaled draw 30cm Pro4.5 cm and the Maximum Distance Between Them is 30x28'000 840'000 .000 = .000 cm = 8400,000 m = 8400 km.

Sun If We Have Represented by a soccer ball 30cm, Located in Medellin, Proxima Would Be a Tennis ball diameter of 4.5 cm, Located in Spain.

What There Is in this space? Gasses, dust, small solid Bodies, in the Cosmologic microscopic scale.

A bit far from Proxima Centauri is alpha, Whose Sun's diameter is 1.2 and Whose distance from Sun is 4.35 l and 4.11 x10 Which Are 13 km. In the Former scale, Alpha Centauri Will Be Located to 9000 km from Medellin, but very likely Not in Spain, But in the Pacific Ocean, midway Between Los Angeles and Australia.

To end, let's Consider the brightest star Sirius. Its diameter is 1.71 and the distance Sun's Sun - Sirius is 8.13x1013 km.

The Sirius representation, HAVING Sun in Medellin, is a 51 cm ball, Located 17,400 miles from Medellin, it is to say, likely in New Zealand.

Juan Fernando Sanin
Medellin Colombia

CH TMLXC

Medellín September 24, 2008

a crowded Universe, but almost a complete vacuum.

Our solar system is a big gap. The Sun has a diameter of 1'400 .000 km. The Earth has a diameter of 12,000 km and its distance from the Sun is 000 km 149'000. That is the Sun's diameter may be 106 times the Earth-Sun distance. The diameter of the Earth is 1 / 116 of the diameter of the Sun

This implies that if the sun will represent a 30cm diameter ball, the Earth must put 30x106cm = 3180cm = 31.80 m é ; sta would scale representation 30/116 cm = 0.25 cm

The giant planet Jupiter is the solar system. Its diameter is about 140,000 km and its distance from the Sun is 778.600.000km. The diameter of the sun, it is 556 times Earth's distance from the sun. Thus, if we represent the sun with a ball of 30cm diameter, J &desktop search; piter be located 30x556cm = 16.680cm = 166.8 m and its diameter would scale 1 / 10 the diameter of the Sun, that is 3 cm.

Let's see what happens with Pluto, the dwarf planet and one of the most distant objects from the Sun. Pluto's diameter is about 1 / 1000 the diameter of the Sun and Pluto Sun distance is 000 km 5870'000. The diameter of the Sun can be 4192 times Pluto's distance from the sun. If we keep the same representation, ie the sun a ball of 30 cm, then Pluto be & iacute, to located 30x4192cm = 125,760 cm = 1257.6 m and diameter of 0.3 cm would be scaled.

Get out of our solar system. The nearest star to Earth is Proxima in the Milky Way. Next Sun distance is 3.98 x10 ^{13 km and its diameter is 0.15 the diameter of the sun The sun's diameter should be .000 28'000 times in the distance. A scaled representation of the system, the sun represented by a 30cm diameter ball, we positioned close to 30x28'000 840'000 .000 .000 cm = cm = 8400.000 m = 8400 km and its representation would be a ball of 4.5 cm.}

If we have the Sun represented by a ball 30 cm in diameter, located in Medellín, Next will be represented by a tennis ball of 4.5 cm located in Spain .

What exists in this great space? Low density gas, dust and microscopic solid objects in the cosmic scale.

After Next, another nearby star is Alpha Centauri which is 4.35 light-years, equivalent to 4.11 x10 ^{13km and its diameter is 1.2 on the Sun As in the previous case, if the sun is represented by the ball 30 cm, the star would be located more than 9000 km, but not in Spain, but perhaps in the Pacific Ocean near Australia.}

Sirius is the brightest star seen from earth. It has a diameter of 1.71, the Sun's diameter and distance between the two stars is 8.13x1013 km.

Sirius representation would be a big ball of 51 cm, located maso least in New Zealand.

C

HTMLXC

Fatty Knees Sailboat For Sale What happens when a small body approaches the earth

Roche limit

Two different state bodies in the gaseous, spherical in shape, which we will call primary and secondary, have masses M and m respectively. Their radii are R yry their densities are ρ and ρ _{M m} . The distance between the two bodies is d. See Figure 1.

When the distance r, R d are comparable. The concept of comparability is a bit biased, but we can try to understand considering that the Earth Moon system is comparable radii and distances. Indeed, the radius of the earth is 6400 km, 1738 km from the moon and the distances between the two is 384.000 km.

The distance d is 60 times and 220 times r. R Although a wide representation imply large distances has been considered that this range of measures can be considered comparable, as the systems formed by each planet and each of its moons.

Figure 1

M m bodies exert a force on each other, resulting in deformation each of them, being most notable in the small body of mass m.

In Figures 2 to 6 we can observe the effect of the force exerted by the large body on the small, depending on the distance d.

Figure 2

A body fluid, which maintains its structure for its internal gravity and orbiting a larger object, has a spherical shape while away the Roche limit. Roche limit represented by the white circle line.

Figure 3

Closer to the Roche limit the fluid is deformed by the action of tidal forces

Figure 4

Roche Within the limits of gravity of the fluid is not sufficient to maintain its shape and the body is broken by the action of the tidal force.

CHT MLXC

Figure 5

The red arrows represent the orbital velocity of the dispersed remnants of the satellite. The internal particles orbit more quickly than the outer.

The name comes from the Roche limit French astronomer Édouard Roche , who first proposed this effect and calculated the theoretical limit ; rich 1848.

& amp; nbsp;

Roche limit depends on the severity of the central body, but also the characteristics of density and size of the satellite.

Some satellites, both natural and artificial, orbit at distances less than the Roche limit, maintaining its structure by forces other than gravity: the strength of the material. Among the moons of Jupiter both Adrastea Metis as are examples of natural bodies that maintain their cohesiónmeyond their Roche limits. However, any object on the surface can be shelled and broken up by tidal forces. A less cohesive body, like a comet will be destroyed when passing through the Roche limit. The comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 crossed the Jupiter's Roche limit in July 1992 , breaking into numerous fragments. In 1994 the remains of comet impacts on Earth's surface.

deformab Bodies Rigid Bodies them

The other extreme case a satellite is able to deform without any resistance, just as you would a liquid. Although the exact calculation can not be done analytically, a fair approximation can be given by the following formula:

The table below shows the average density and the equatorial radius of different objects in the Solar System .

Body	Density (kg / m³)	Radio (m)
Sun	1,400	695,000. 000
Jupiter	1,330	71,500,000
Earth	5,515 C HTMLXC	6,376,500
Luna	3,340	1,737,400

With

these data, the Roche limit for rigid bodies and deformable bodies can be easily calculated. The average density of comets

can be seen around 500 kg / m³.

True Roche limit depends on the flexibility of satelliteelite, so it will be somewhere between the limits calculated for the rigid body and deformable body perfectly calculated above. If the central body has a density greater than half the orbiting body, the Roche limit is reached below the radius of the planet and the satellite can not reach this limit. This is the case, for example, the Roche limit for the system Sun - Earth. The following table gives the limits of Roche expressed in meters and radios central body. CH

TMLXC

Roche limit (hard) Roche limit (not hard) Distance (m) Distance (m) Earth Earth So is interesting to consider how close they are different moons of Solar System

Main Satellite
			Radio		Radio
	CHTMLX LunaC 9,495,665	1.49	18,261,459	2.86
	Comet 17,883,432	2.80	34,392,279		5.39
l Earth	554,441,389	0.80	1,066,266,402	1.53
Sun	Comet 1,234,186,562	1.78	2373. 509,071	C3.42 HTMLXC

their Roche limits. The following table gives the orbital radius of each satellite divided by its Roche limit in both cases of rigid and flexible body. In the case of the giant planets have only considered the smaller inner satellites. The main and satellite Io in Jupiter or Titan in Saturn are at distances greater than their Roche limits.

central body (Rigid) Sun Earth Luna Mars Phobos Deimos Jupiter Adrastea Amalthea Tebe Saturn Pan HTMLXC Prometheus Pandora Epimetheus Uranus Ofelia Bianca Cressida Thelassa is interesting that the smaller satellites of giant planets near their Roche limits, its structure maintained by internal forces cohesióny not only by gravity. In the region dominated by rings, like the rings of Saturn

Satellite	Radio Orbital: Roche limit
		(Not Hard)
	Mercury 104:1	54:1
	41:1	21:1
	171%	89%
	456%	237%
	Metis 191%	99%
	192%	100%
	178%	93%
	331%	172%
	177%	92%	CAtlas
	182%	95%
	185%	96 %
	188%	98%
	198 % C HTMLXC	103%
Cordelia	155%	81%
	168%	87%
	184%	96%
	193%	100%
Neptune Naiades	144%	75%
	149% CH78%	TMLXC	Despina
	157%	82%	Galatea
	184%	96%	Larissa
	219%	114%	Pluto
Charon	13:1	6,8:1

, groups it is impossibleation of particles in large bodies because they would be dispersed by the effects of the tidal force

. These satellites probably had its origin in remote regions of the giant planets and their orbits were later modified perhaps by the gravitational interaction of the other satellites. Alternatively, perhaps they were formed in regions close to their current positions when the planets were still in full power background, and had a lower mass. This second scenario is less likely however. Roche limit depends on the rigidity of the satellite orbiting the planet. On the one hand, this could be a perfect sphere in which case the Roche limit is

R

Where is the
radio

the main body, ρ

M is your density and ρ m is the density of the satellite. _{If the moon has a density greater than twice the density of the planet, justas may occur in a satellite orbiting a gas giant rock, then the Roche limit would be within the planet itself and a magnitude would be relevant.}

SOLAR SYSTEM GENERAL

Sidereal Period is the time it takes for a planet return to the same place in its orbit, relative to the stars.

Perihelion and aphelion distances are the closest and farthest planet from the Sun

The inclination is relative to the Earth's orbital plane, the plane of the ecliptic.

Globes Planets:

The Flattening (Oblateness) is a measure of how the figure of the planet moves away from the ball.

The rotation period for each planet, is the period relative to the stars. It is slightly different from the period covered by the Sun, the Earth called the day.

to the planets Venus, Uranus and Pluto, the inclination of the axis of rotation (Tilt) is greater than 90 degrees, and these planets (and satellites of Uranus) rotate in the opposite direction to their orbits. In contrast, all other planets, their satellites and the Sun, rotate and move around the Sun with the same rotation.

concepts and images Source: wikipedia

;

Bipolar Disorder More Condition_symptoms How is it possible, from within the Milky Way, which is inferred structure.

First, it is difficult for a person who does not move in the scientific field of astrophysics, imagine how, from within the Milky Way, you can recreate the figure and structure itself. It is as if from inside an office building, we could understand and recreate the distribution.

However, astrophysicists, with the management they give to the rays of the strip is not visible light, infrared and ultraviolet, can make inferences approximate, not only the object emits light, but the medium flowing through from origin to destination. The example of the building, extrowing, as in the case study of the Milky Way, although we are in, there are no walls that prevent us from seeing the stars that form and the surrounding interstellar medium, which is not completely opaque.

Spitzer Space Telescope has led to the conclusion that our Galaxy has two arms and not four as previously thought. Since the Earth is at one end, inside, it is difficult to recreate or draw as

The theory of the four arms was stellar been impossibleto confirm until now precisely because of the fact that the Earth is inside the Milky Way. Since 1950, astronomers had with models based on observations of galactic cosmic gases, suggesting a spiral structure with four arms of stars, called Norma, Scutum-Centaurus, Sagittarius and Perseus. Our Sun is between Perseus and Sagittarius.

For many years, created maps of the whole galaxy based on studying a section of it or a single method, expressed Some NASA scientists.

devised in the past maps. Unfortunately, when comparing the models developed by various groups, not always coincided. The surveys of the sky at infrared, conducted in the 90's, led to revise previous ideas included the discovery of a large bar of stars in the middle of the Milky Way. Infrared light can penetrate through dust, so telescopes designed to capture this radiation provide better views of our galactic center, dusty and full of stars.

In 2005 astronomers at the University of Wisconsin turned to Spitzer's detectors to obtain information as possible on the galactic bar. They found that through the galactic center extendíaa far beyond what was previously thought.

The team now has new images provided by Spitzer. The target was an area of the Milky Way abarca 130 degrees along the sky and one degree above and below the midplane of the galaxy. This extensive mosaic combines 800,000 snapshots and includes about 110 billion stars.

addition to the comments, the working group developed a software for counting stars and measuring stellar densities. By counting stars in the direction of the Scutum-Centaurus Arm found out that their number increased, as expected in a spiral arm. But when they looked in the direction where they expected to see the Sagittarius and Norma arms found no jump in the number of stars. The fourth arm, Perseus, wraps lthe outer portion of the Milky Way and can not be seen in Spitzer images.

Conclusion

really is difficult to understand how it has been road recreation milk at different stages, before Spitzer and even after this. This recreation has been changing over time, to the extent that greater awareness of the nature of light and built the most modern equipment. I'm not clear on & quamp; eacute; are made and how they are formed, the main arms, like the Orion Spur, which is where today, temporarily, is our solar system.

have to be ready and prepared for future adjustments of the structure of the Milky Way, as we know more the cosmos and better tools to take a view from the outside, which not necessarily be achieved by placing a camera, a project that is almost impossible, but taking advantage of other properties of light, such asreflection.